<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Teens and Sex from an Attachment Perspective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theattachedfamily.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theattachedfamily.com/?p=2711</link>
	<description>Connecting with our children for a more compassionate world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MSG</title>
		<link>http://theattachedfamily.com/?p=2711&#038;cpage=1#comment-14679</link>
		<dc:creator>MSG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 20:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theattachedfamily.com/membersonly/?p=2711#comment-14679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find it very interesting that Lisa, Emi, and Miriam had completely lost the point of the article.  This article is based on Dr. Gordon Neufeld’s attachment theory which is all about nurturing the natural developmental process of a child as opposed to what 95% of the population adheres to which is behavioural process.  I would strongly recommend that you ladies take a look at his website and adhere yourselves to some of his materials since I assume that you ladies all have children.  I sense that you are all coming from a place of being wronged.  You had assumed that this article is telling you that how you’ve raised your children so far is wrong...and if you are getting such huge negative reactions to this article, then you probably are.  However, it is never too late to start attaching to your children the right way.

Miriam, no way in this article had religion been mentioned.  Please note that the definition of marriage could be widely accepted as:  “Marriage (also called matrimony or wedlock) is a social union or legal contract between people called spouses that establishes rights and obligations between the spouses, between the spouses and their children, and between the spouses and their in-laws.[1] The definition of marriage varies according to different cultures, but it is principally an institution in which interpersonal relationships, usually intimate and sexual, are acknowledged. When defined broadly, marriage is considered a cultural universal.”  This has nothing to do with any religion.
 
Secondly, there is nothing in this article that stated the ‘only way’ to have a deep meaningful relationship with another human being is to be married.  She simply stated that the ‘greatest expression of sexuality is in the context of marriage when all elements of attachment can be fulfilled’.  She didn’t say it was the ONLY way.  

I understand that it is very hard to feel that you have been wronged and that your feelings of ‘not good enough’ has been triggered by this article and this article simply lets you look at how you’ve been raising your children and to let you know that if you keep going the same path...your children could very well grow up using sex as a way to attach to another human being.  Then we wonder why teenage pregnancies and STDs are on the rise.  All I’m saying is now you ladies know that there is another way of doing things better then do better so you can change your legacies once and for all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it very interesting that Lisa, Emi, and Miriam had completely lost the point of the article.  This article is based on Dr. Gordon Neufeld’s attachment theory which is all about nurturing the natural developmental process of a child as opposed to what 95% of the population adheres to which is behavioural process.  I would strongly recommend that you ladies take a look at his website and adhere yourselves to some of his materials since I assume that you ladies all have children.  I sense that you are all coming from a place of being wronged.  You had assumed that this article is telling you that how you’ve raised your children so far is wrong&#8230;and if you are getting such huge negative reactions to this article, then you probably are.  However, it is never too late to start attaching to your children the right way.</p>
<p>Miriam, no way in this article had religion been mentioned.  Please note that the definition of marriage could be widely accepted as:  “Marriage (also called matrimony or wedlock) is a social union or legal contract between people called spouses that establishes rights and obligations between the spouses, between the spouses and their children, and between the spouses and their in-laws.[1] The definition of marriage varies according to different cultures, but it is principally an institution in which interpersonal relationships, usually intimate and sexual, are acknowledged. When defined broadly, marriage is considered a cultural universal.”  This has nothing to do with any religion.</p>
<p>Secondly, there is nothing in this article that stated the ‘only way’ to have a deep meaningful relationship with another human being is to be married.  She simply stated that the ‘greatest expression of sexuality is in the context of marriage when all elements of attachment can be fulfilled’.  She didn’t say it was the ONLY way.  </p>
<p>I understand that it is very hard to feel that you have been wronged and that your feelings of ‘not good enough’ has been triggered by this article and this article simply lets you look at how you’ve been raising your children and to let you know that if you keep going the same path&#8230;your children could very well grow up using sex as a way to attach to another human being.  Then we wonder why teenage pregnancies and STDs are on the rise.  All I’m saying is now you ladies know that there is another way of doing things better then do better so you can change your legacies once and for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cast of ncis</title>
		<link>http://theattachedfamily.com/?p=2711&#038;cpage=1#comment-13191</link>
		<dc:creator>cast of ncis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 19:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theattachedfamily.com/membersonly/?p=2711#comment-13191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This site was... how do you say it? Relevant!! Finally I&#039;ve found something which helped me. Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site was&#8230; how do you say it? Relevant!! Finally I&#8217;ve found something which helped me. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Anthony</title>
		<link>http://theattachedfamily.com/?p=2711&#038;cpage=1#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theattachedfamily.com/membersonly/?p=2711#comment-985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Refreshing article.  

I would take things one step further and say that the reason the divorce rate is so high in the Western world is because too many people marry people they do not truly love.  

Why would that be?   Probably because the words &quot;I love you.&quot; become a painful reminder of a lie told by a previous lover.  Thus, people tend to want to escape true love as their hearts are hardened.  They choose spouse to provide something that they never got in previous sexual relationships and it never works out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Refreshing article.  </p>
<p>I would take things one step further and say that the reason the divorce rate is so high in the Western world is because too many people marry people they do not truly love.  </p>
<p>Why would that be?   Probably because the words &#8220;I love you.&#8221; become a painful reminder of a lie told by a previous lover.  Thus, people tend to want to escape true love as their hearts are hardened.  They choose spouse to provide something that they never got in previous sexual relationships and it never works out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caitlin</title>
		<link>http://theattachedfamily.com/?p=2711&#038;cpage=1#comment-895</link>
		<dc:creator>Caitlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theattachedfamily.com/membersonly/?p=2711#comment-895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While is it is true that even less than two hundred hears ago teens used to get married and have babies at 16 or younger, that was within the protection of a relationship that was monogamous, and usually with a man who was himself already a bread-winning adult.  There was no fear of not being able to provide for a baby as a single teenage mother (barring exigent circumstance)and the BIGGEST difference is that there was no pressure for girls to please several different boys for social status and acceptance- in fact, back then it was the opposite.  A girl was revered for her abstinence.  

The point of this article was not to say anything about adults who engage in premarital sex, but to educate readers on the detriments of not having close relationships with their children, which can and usually does lead to those children looking for that closeness outside the home, with their peers and boy/girlfriends, which when combined with the current social and pop climate of very early sexual activity, (generally with someone whom they do not love or can have a safe and secure relationship) this leads to the disastrous result of not only unwanted pregnancies (which, because of the possibility of adoption is not the longest-lasting casualty of this event) but of lasting tendencies toward outward methods of feeling loved and esteemed, instead of having an inner knowledge of self-esteem. A 13 year old boy or girl with strong family ties and feelings of self-worth and self-sufficiency does not need to find it elsewhere.  

This article is totally unrelated to the maturation of a teenager&#039;s sexuality- a process which is normal and to which attention needs to be paid, but this article is solely about those children and teens who turn to sexual activity not out of making a mature decision to take that next step with a loving partner, but out of desperation to find the closeness they are missing, and sadly, to gain acceptance from peers- the absolute WORST reason to engage in sexual activity.  

Those who have commented about religion being involved in this article did not read the words, but read what they feared to hear, as evidenced by their comments, as themselves have engaged in premarital sex and were solely intent on justifying their own actions, instead of listening to the research coming about how to help future generations.  

Those who have commented about sexual activity being a natural part of the teenage years also didn&#039;t actually take in what the article said- which was that the trends are now showing the majority of teens engaging in sexual activity- which because of those high numbers, we now see it as &quot;normal&quot;.  I think what the article is trying to say is that this new &quot;normal&quot; is not healthy for teenagers- that instead of looking for that love and cultivating their sexuality, they should be cultivating their relationships with their parents (which is the parents&#039; job to instigate). 

We need to look at teen sexuality in a different paradigm and see that maybe with proper attention to a child&#039;s relationship with his parents, that sexuality can be something in which he is calmly in control, unfettered by pressure from peers, and satisfied with himself enough to take his sexuality for what it is- a normal part of his life, not as a means to status or something to be used for anything other than the natural pursuit of a meaningful relationship, and not used by anyone else to elevate their status or control over him either, by introducing the pleasure of sexuality without the natural twin of it&#039;s responsibility, eventually yielding broken hearts on what is eventually both sides.  This is what the educational research of this article is trying to say, nothing more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While is it is true that even less than two hundred hears ago teens used to get married and have babies at 16 or younger, that was within the protection of a relationship that was monogamous, and usually with a man who was himself already a bread-winning adult.  There was no fear of not being able to provide for a baby as a single teenage mother (barring exigent circumstance)and the BIGGEST difference is that there was no pressure for girls to please several different boys for social status and acceptance- in fact, back then it was the opposite.  A girl was revered for her abstinence.  </p>
<p>The point of this article was not to say anything about adults who engage in premarital sex, but to educate readers on the detriments of not having close relationships with their children, which can and usually does lead to those children looking for that closeness outside the home, with their peers and boy/girlfriends, which when combined with the current social and pop climate of very early sexual activity, (generally with someone whom they do not love or can have a safe and secure relationship) this leads to the disastrous result of not only unwanted pregnancies (which, because of the possibility of adoption is not the longest-lasting casualty of this event) but of lasting tendencies toward outward methods of feeling loved and esteemed, instead of having an inner knowledge of self-esteem. A 13 year old boy or girl with strong family ties and feelings of self-worth and self-sufficiency does not need to find it elsewhere.  </p>
<p>This article is totally unrelated to the maturation of a teenager&#8217;s sexuality- a process which is normal and to which attention needs to be paid, but this article is solely about those children and teens who turn to sexual activity not out of making a mature decision to take that next step with a loving partner, but out of desperation to find the closeness they are missing, and sadly, to gain acceptance from peers- the absolute WORST reason to engage in sexual activity.  </p>
<p>Those who have commented about religion being involved in this article did not read the words, but read what they feared to hear, as evidenced by their comments, as themselves have engaged in premarital sex and were solely intent on justifying their own actions, instead of listening to the research coming about how to help future generations.  </p>
<p>Those who have commented about sexual activity being a natural part of the teenage years also didn&#8217;t actually take in what the article said- which was that the trends are now showing the majority of teens engaging in sexual activity- which because of those high numbers, we now see it as &#8220;normal&#8221;.  I think what the article is trying to say is that this new &#8220;normal&#8221; is not healthy for teenagers- that instead of looking for that love and cultivating their sexuality, they should be cultivating their relationships with their parents (which is the parents&#8217; job to instigate). </p>
<p>We need to look at teen sexuality in a different paradigm and see that maybe with proper attention to a child&#8217;s relationship with his parents, that sexuality can be something in which he is calmly in control, unfettered by pressure from peers, and satisfied with himself enough to take his sexuality for what it is- a normal part of his life, not as a means to status or something to be used for anything other than the natural pursuit of a meaningful relationship, and not used by anyone else to elevate their status or control over him either, by introducing the pleasure of sexuality without the natural twin of it&#8217;s responsibility, eventually yielding broken hearts on what is eventually both sides.  This is what the educational research of this article is trying to say, nothing more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://theattachedfamily.com/?p=2711&#038;cpage=1#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theattachedfamily.com/membersonly/?p=2711#comment-889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sexual freedom is indeed a reality, not a myth! Please consider that women (and men that are often homosexual) are persecuted and killed in MANY parts of the world during (even what this article suggests is) an appropriate time to explore sexuality and form intimate relationships with others. When we begin to talk in the way the article presents in some statements I fear we begin to tread on the side of control and fear-based relationship building with our kids. Usage of the term “hierarchical ” makes my (dare I say) feminist nerves tingle, too!  

I agree, yes, to have a working parental relationship with your children you need to develop in them an understanding of who is “the boss.” However, control and power in any relationship makes it difficult to even begin to see the benefits of our attachment parenting skills and hard work to shine through. Physical intimacy is DEVELOPMENTALLY appropriate to explore for children in this stage, and please, if there’s one thing we all know, human behavior does not happen in a psychological vacuum-this article is most definitely political in many respects! I work with many sexually active young girls and teens who were forced into the situations they faced in their past. I dare you to ask them if they think sexual freedom is a myth.

Overall, I appreciated this reading. I got a lot out of this discussion on intimacy though I agree that I was not expecting the language that was used on API. I particularly appreciate the second paragraph which beautifully illustrates our cultures definition of maturity. Thanks for posting it and getting an interesting conversation going!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sexual freedom is indeed a reality, not a myth! Please consider that women (and men that are often homosexual) are persecuted and killed in MANY parts of the world during (even what this article suggests is) an appropriate time to explore sexuality and form intimate relationships with others. When we begin to talk in the way the article presents in some statements I fear we begin to tread on the side of control and fear-based relationship building with our kids. Usage of the term “hierarchical ” makes my (dare I say) feminist nerves tingle, too!  </p>
<p>I agree, yes, to have a working parental relationship with your children you need to develop in them an understanding of who is “the boss.” However, control and power in any relationship makes it difficult to even begin to see the benefits of our attachment parenting skills and hard work to shine through. Physical intimacy is DEVELOPMENTALLY appropriate to explore for children in this stage, and please, if there’s one thing we all know, human behavior does not happen in a psychological vacuum-this article is most definitely political in many respects! I work with many sexually active young girls and teens who were forced into the situations they faced in their past. I dare you to ask them if they think sexual freedom is a myth.</p>
<p>Overall, I appreciated this reading. I got a lot out of this discussion on intimacy though I agree that I was not expecting the language that was used on API. I particularly appreciate the second paragraph which beautifully illustrates our cultures definition of maturity. Thanks for posting it and getting an interesting conversation going!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marja</title>
		<link>http://theattachedfamily.com/?p=2711&#038;cpage=1#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Marja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theattachedfamily.com/membersonly/?p=2711#comment-826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many people seem to forget that adolescents have been sexually active since the beginning of time. 16 year olds losing their virginity is not a new thing brought about by television and pop culture. 16, and even younger, used to be consider a &quot;normal&quot; age to marry and have babies! I think it is important to think in terms of talking about sex in a positive and productive way, but enough with the &quot;blame&quot; (including the blame placed on perfectly normal, not abusive or neglectful, parents). In many cultures where families maintain very strong bonds you will still find 14 and 15 year olds losing their virginity (certainly not for lack of a bond with important adults).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people seem to forget that adolescents have been sexually active since the beginning of time. 16 year olds losing their virginity is not a new thing brought about by television and pop culture. 16, and even younger, used to be consider a &#8220;normal&#8221; age to marry and have babies! I think it is important to think in terms of talking about sex in a positive and productive way, but enough with the &#8220;blame&#8221; (including the blame placed on perfectly normal, not abusive or neglectful, parents). In many cultures where families maintain very strong bonds you will still find 14 and 15 year olds losing their virginity (certainly not for lack of a bond with important adults).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danla</title>
		<link>http://theattachedfamily.com/?p=2711&#038;cpage=1#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>Danla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 03:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theattachedfamily.com/membersonly/?p=2711#comment-768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i think the person who wrote this needs to edit. not every teen that has a problem with their parents or grades goes and has sex or drugs or stuff like that. when teens fall in love they dont copy what others do but they find it hard to express themselves sometimes. Sex is part of the circle of life and shouldnt be labled as a bad thing for it is through sex that we are still alive. many adults are not married yet have had kids and sex. bieng married is just a social status and has NOTHING to do with seroiuse love. it is true teens that are over controlled by parents have more sex than other teens but doesnt neccarily mean that if ur child is haveing aproblem in school she or he will probably have sex and u need to keep that child away from contact of the other gender.children who are not heard and are feeling confused are the ones who fall in love hoping for one who will understand and listen to them and go have sex being stupid and not understanding. but they are kids and parents need to guide them without pushing them. so i find that any sexual realtionshop of teens started because of the parents.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the person who wrote this needs to edit. not every teen that has a problem with their parents or grades goes and has sex or drugs or stuff like that. when teens fall in love they dont copy what others do but they find it hard to express themselves sometimes. Sex is part of the circle of life and shouldnt be labled as a bad thing for it is through sex that we are still alive. many adults are not married yet have had kids and sex. bieng married is just a social status and has NOTHING to do with seroiuse love. it is true teens that are over controlled by parents have more sex than other teens but doesnt neccarily mean that if ur child is haveing aproblem in school she or he will probably have sex and u need to keep that child away from contact of the other gender.children who are not heard and are feeling confused are the ones who fall in love hoping for one who will understand and listen to them and go have sex being stupid and not understanding. but they are kids and parents need to guide them without pushing them. so i find that any sexual realtionshop of teens started because of the parents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy</title>
		<link>http://theattachedfamily.com/?p=2711&#038;cpage=1#comment-737</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 04:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theattachedfamily.com/membersonly/?p=2711#comment-737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was shocked reading some of these comments... jumping to religion???  Wow.  I think this was a very well written article and much needed for some parents above to hear (obviously).  I agree that sex is a beautiful thing that should be embraced but I think some commenters above do not realize the extreme sexuality that is developing in our culture.  I teach sixth graders... to put that into perspective, 11 year olds.  Many of these girls already have &quot;boyfriends&quot; and a few are already experimenting sexually... 11 year olds.  They see it on TV, they listen to it in music, they believe this is how they are &quot;suppose&quot; to act.  It is sad.  They think they are nothing unless they have a boyfriend and will go to all lengths to get one and keep one.  I watch some very sweet girls get themselves into situations that I know will leave scars the rest of their lives.  It is refreshing to hear some support on the science front saying that condoms won&#039;t heal the broken heart... cause we have a lot of little girls still in training bras thinking about or having sex (or just giving BJs to satisfy boys) and handing them condoms and pills solves nothing.  Thank you for taking the risk and publishing this article- I think it is an extremely important topic to cover!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was shocked reading some of these comments&#8230; jumping to religion???  Wow.  I think this was a very well written article and much needed for some parents above to hear (obviously).  I agree that sex is a beautiful thing that should be embraced but I think some commenters above do not realize the extreme sexuality that is developing in our culture.  I teach sixth graders&#8230; to put that into perspective, 11 year olds.  Many of these girls already have &#8220;boyfriends&#8221; and a few are already experimenting sexually&#8230; 11 year olds.  They see it on TV, they listen to it in music, they believe this is how they are &#8220;suppose&#8221; to act.  It is sad.  They think they are nothing unless they have a boyfriend and will go to all lengths to get one and keep one.  I watch some very sweet girls get themselves into situations that I know will leave scars the rest of their lives.  It is refreshing to hear some support on the science front saying that condoms won&#8217;t heal the broken heart&#8230; cause we have a lot of little girls still in training bras thinking about or having sex (or just giving BJs to satisfy boys) and handing them condoms and pills solves nothing.  Thank you for taking the risk and publishing this article- I think it is an extremely important topic to cover!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EClark</title>
		<link>http://theattachedfamily.com/?p=2711&#038;cpage=1#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>EClark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theattachedfamily.com/membersonly/?p=2711#comment-734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My daughters were both raised in an ap way and are now adult teenagers. One of them was very attached early to her boyfriend. She had deep relationships with each boy for one or two years from 14 onwards. I let them develop their sexuality in their own private way. They both have no shame around it. I feel it is private but at the same time I don&#039;t tell them not to have a sexual relationship. They both did not tell me when they lost their virginity. But it came out later. I just ask that they are respectful of their bodies and others feelings. And I make jokes about baby beings on a regular basis. I is an ongoing discussion. They weren&#039;t raised with a tv either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My daughters were both raised in an ap way and are now adult teenagers. One of them was very attached early to her boyfriend. She had deep relationships with each boy for one or two years from 14 onwards. I let them develop their sexuality in their own private way. They both have no shame around it. I feel it is private but at the same time I don&#8217;t tell them not to have a sexual relationship. They both did not tell me when they lost their virginity. But it came out later. I just ask that they are respectful of their bodies and others feelings. And I make jokes about baby beings on a regular basis. I is an ongoing discussion. They weren&#8217;t raised with a tv either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://theattachedfamily.com/?p=2711&#038;cpage=1#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theattachedfamily.com/membersonly/?p=2711#comment-732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally someone who explains that sex is not just a cheap hook up that all kids just can&#039;t help but participate in! Condoms don&#039;t heal broken hearts any more than they provide 100% safe sex.  Our kids seek sex for a reason...and it is not because they are mature and ready at 13 in today&#039;s social construct! Another interesting theory was mentioned in response to the evolutionary theory of survial that when a species feels threatened...it seeks to procreate earlier and earlier...and that our youth is feeling survival threatened due to the early stress and unmet need for strong attachment to their life source...their mother. It was an interesting concept and not a lick of religious dogma about it.  Discussing theory has notta to do with being heterosexist! Humans are mammals, our behavior is mammalian.  It is so easy to get sucked into attaching your own theories of religion, politics and sexuality as &#039;recreation&#039; when the concepts being discussed are more about the developing brain and the need for attachment that forms at various ages in different ways.  It is nearly unheard of in mainstream parenting to read anything beyond teens need sex, give them condoms in school! This was beyond refreshing! And, yes, i do teach my kids that sex is not a toy or a game.  Anything so powerful it creates life has purpose.  Just becauase we have learned how to circumvent biology of conception does not mean our mammal brain has caught up with the reality that procreation is the purpose of sexuality and the sexuality is bonding to protect offspring.  There is no social political correctness in biology.  There is just science.  This is true in many areas of reproduction where our science is able to over ride biology, but our brains have not necessarily caught up with that reality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally someone who explains that sex is not just a cheap hook up that all kids just can&#8217;t help but participate in! Condoms don&#8217;t heal broken hearts any more than they provide 100% safe sex.  Our kids seek sex for a reason&#8230;and it is not because they are mature and ready at 13 in today&#8217;s social construct! Another interesting theory was mentioned in response to the evolutionary theory of survial that when a species feels threatened&#8230;it seeks to procreate earlier and earlier&#8230;and that our youth is feeling survival threatened due to the early stress and unmet need for strong attachment to their life source&#8230;their mother. It was an interesting concept and not a lick of religious dogma about it.  Discussing theory has notta to do with being heterosexist! Humans are mammals, our behavior is mammalian.  It is so easy to get sucked into attaching your own theories of religion, politics and sexuality as &#8216;recreation&#8217; when the concepts being discussed are more about the developing brain and the need for attachment that forms at various ages in different ways.  It is nearly unheard of in mainstream parenting to read anything beyond teens need sex, give them condoms in school! This was beyond refreshing! And, yes, i do teach my kids that sex is not a toy or a game.  Anything so powerful it creates life has purpose.  Just becauase we have learned how to circumvent biology of conception does not mean our mammal brain has caught up with the reality that procreation is the purpose of sexuality and the sexuality is bonding to protect offspring.  There is no social political correctness in biology.  There is just science.  This is true in many areas of reproduction where our science is able to over ride biology, but our brains have not necessarily caught up with that reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
