Thu, 04/24/2014 – 1:01 | No Comment

In this issue of Attached Family, we take a look at the cultural explosion of breastfeeding advocacy, as well as the challenges still to overcome. API writer Sheena Sommers begins this issue with “The Real Breastfeeding Story,” including …

Read the full story »
1. Pregnancy & Birth

Fertility and conception, pregnancy, childbirth, and the early postpartum period.

2. The Infant

From newborn to 17 months.

3. The Toddler

From 18 months to age 3.

4. The Growing Child

From age 4 to age 9.

5. The Adolescent

From age 10 to age 18.

Home » 5. The Adolescent

Attachment Parenting Our Teens

Submitted by on Tuesday, August 2 201127 Comments

By Laurie A. Couture, author of Instead of Medicating and Punishing

So many attachment parents start out so passionate about giving very young children the best start possible in life: Moms birth naturally, spare their sons the trauma of circumcision by keeping them intact, breastfeed for at least three years or longer, carry their babies at all times, cosleep for several years, and they ideally are gentle and nurturing to their young ones as the children begin to assert their wants and express upset emotions.

Sadly, however, something happens between the ages of seven and 12 in far too many families who started out as attachment-minded: Moms and dads stop parenting for attachment and connection and start letting the mainstream lifestyle creep in. This often translates into sending children to school to suffer with all of its toxic elements, passively allowing children to become saturated and enslaved by the media, consumerism, pop culture and peer culture. And most tragically, moms pull away emotionally and physically from their older children.

If children as young as seven to 12 years old are being slowly absorbed into the mainstream cultural ideals of consuming and “individuating,” where does that leave our teenaged children? Very lost and disconnected, for sure!

Even in the Attachment Parenting (AP) community, writings about adolescent children have a negative and anti-attachment twinge to them: Most writings about parenting teens advise that teens should be  “individuating” from their parents and parents should be “pulling back” and “letting go” of their adolescent children. Due to years of “letting go,” parents of teens seem to passively assume that the disconnected behavior of their teens is “natural” and they oblige: They pull away and let go of their child even more.

My beautiful 17-year-old son Brycen is a free-spirited, self-directed child who revels in the freedom of unschooling. His expression of his individualism is unique, evolving and all his own creation. He is busy with endless creative pursuits, music, community activities, and flexible work of his choosing. He can sometimes be gone for days with back-to-back plans with friends. He knows that if he wanted to travel, or manifest an opportunity in his life, I would stand behind him in doing it. Brycen is truly a free child!

The most important essence of his life, however, is that he and I are deeply and closely connected. The parent-child attachment security and his needs are just as much my priority now as they were when he was little. Physically, emotionally, spiritually, and creatively, I have not “backed off,” “stepped back,” or “let go.” I have not relaxed my protection of him, diluted my delight in him, or weakened my nurturance of him. Instead, as if he was little, I have remained a loving, nurturing, affectionate, compassionate, protecting, delighted, supportive, and passionate mom to my son throughout his adolescence. In doing so, I have set him free to grow holistically.

What is your emotional reaction to this? Do you feel happiness, warmth, and a sense of bliss? Or do you feel uncomfortable, anxious or defensive — a desire to  give me your contrary opinion?

Our society seems to feel very uncomfortable about parent-teen closeness, especially mom and son closeness. These are deep cultural wounds in the collective unconscious that continue to be part of our culture. Tragically, as a result of this harmful emotionally charged bias, boys are often cast off physically and emotionally by their moms by their eighth or ninth year of life — a decade before they can handle such a disconnect! Teens who are disconnected from their parents are often stuck in a dynamic with their parents of push and pull, love and hate, compliance and rebellion, clinginess and aggression, being controlled and being pushed away.

Let’s return to nature for a moment: Nature’s intent is the only parenting advice we truly need. Our parenting challenges, concerns, and choices can become so simple if we consider, “What is nature’s intent for a child’s holistic development?” Nature is our reference manual, our guide to mammalian and human needs.

Our closest mammalian relative, a primate called the bonobo, is a great example of mother-adolescent relationships in the wild. In bonobos, the mother is intensely affectionate to her young well into adolescence. The daughter stays with the mother for seven years, at which time she leaves her mother and joins a neighboring tribe of bonobos. The son, however, remains dependent upon his mother for ten years and, as an adult, will be joined by his mate to live with his mother for life.

What about humans? In the Yequana tribe of South America, documented by the late Jean Liedloff in The Continuum Concept, adolescents and young adults remain interdependent with their parents until they marry. There is no teenage rebellion, no “individuating,” no mutual disrespect, no parental pushing away, no “letting go,” no “backing off,” and no “casting out of the nest,” even once the teen reaches adulthood. In fact, if an unmarried young adult’s parents pass away, another family in the tribe will “adopt” the young adult into their family until that adult marries. Parent-child affection, physical nurturance (especially during a time of injury or illness), support, and protection continues in many peaceful, nonviolent tribal societies well into young adulthood, until the adult child marries.

But what about the American mainstream cultural phenomenon of “helicopter parenting” happening to Generation-Y and the Millennials? Isn’t Attachment Parenting adolescents akin to Helicopter Parenting? No doubt, people’s fear of the unhealthy parent-child clinginess of Helicopter Parenting is what incites cultural backlash that is even more harmful. The imfamous Tiger Mother method, a new label on the old problem of child maltreatment, is one example (which ironically is opposite of how real tigers parent their young).

Both Helicopter Parenting and the Tiger Mother method are examples of parenting that is grossly contrary to nature’s intent for children. The children of families that interact in this manner are disconnected and insecurely attached. Such youth are all dependent upon their parents in an unhealthy manner, begging to get basic needs met that have never been met. These ways of raising children are stifling, suffocating, mentally crippling, and in the case of children treated harshly, traumatizing. Children parented in these ways will grow up incompletely, to be holistically wounded, unfulfilled, distressed, empty, and stunted. In both of these extremes, children are not allowed to live and learn in freedom and in joy. Their holistic needs are not met and their passions are not guided and nurtured. In these cases, parents live their children’s lives for them, controlling them every step of the way, giving them only a mirage of a relationship and of a life that evaporates when touched. This is not nature’s intent for children. This is youth maltreatment.

Attachment Parenting our teens means keeping the parent-child connection and attachment secure and strong throughout childhood from birth until adulthood. The behavior and emotional stability of our teens will reflect the quality of this attachment. Attachment Parenting our teens means remaining physically and emotionally affectionate and nurturing, available, compassionate, and sensitive. It means allowing them to unschool to keep them free of the toxic, stressful environments of school. It means allowing your teens to direct their own lives, learning, healthy interests, and passions while you support these endeavors as passionately as you did when they were much younger.

Editor’s Note: The Attached Family invites various views on Attachment Parenting, and this author’s choice of schooling for her child is one of them. Attachment Parenting International takes no stance on schooling and believes that children in formal school settings, as well as homeschooling and unschooling, are equally able to maintain a strong parent-child attachment.

Attachment Parenting means listening to your teens everyday and getting excited about what they are excited about. It means talking openly and honestly with them about things they want to know such as puberty,  masturbation, sex, sexual orientation issues, moral principles, social justice, world events, life and death, philosophy, and spirituality. It means treating teens with respect, dignity, humanity, and care — not speaking to them with sarcasm, cynicism, irritation, and disgust. It means understanding the incredible hormonal changes happening to your children that might mean they appear less responsible or helpful than when they were younger: Be sensitive to and celebratory with them of the amazing metamorphosis their bodies and brains are experiencing! It means protecting them online and in the community from sexually explicit media, predatory adults (men and women), drug addictions, media addictions, and sexually dangerous situations through dialogue, discussion, and honesty about your feelings and principles.

Attachment Parenting means allowing your teen children to unfold as they are, not what you wish for them to be. It means letting go of controlling them but not letting go of nurturing them. It means guiding them in life and cultivating a loving, peaceful, and interdependent relationship with them, where they feel free to branch out, return, branch out again, return, and fly when they are ready. It means holding them in an embrace of unconditional love and emotional support — an attachment bond that will last a lifetime!

27 Comments »

  • Celeste says:

    I apprreciate the positive reinforcement for healthy and nurturing relationships with teens. As a junior high teacher I struggle with witnessing the harmful effects of mainstream society on my students every day. The lack of positive parent involvment in the lives of my students pains me to witness. If nothing else, it reminds me of the type of relationship that I want to foster between my future children and myself. Its rare that one comes across positive notation of teen-adult relationships. I can’t tell you how much this article has reinforced my personal parenting as well as my teaching philosophy. Sometimes it can be difficult to remember why God called me to this vocation, especially when the majority of the people who surround you everyday come from a different mindset that has a negative view of teens and children all together. I relish the opportunity to develop positive relationships with each of my students in order to provide opportunities for physical, mental, emotional and spiritual growth. I wish that there were more resources available for an API oriented individual working in such a mainstream occupation. The Love and Logic resources as well as many from API have served to reinforce my beliefs and have helped me develop my skills as a teacher and teen advocate. I wish more people had an oppertunity to be exposed to the wonderful, amazingly passionate, sensative and unique individuals that I get to work with everyday without the biased opinion that mainstream society adhears to blocking their sight and dampening their opinion of some of the most amazing and potential filled indivduals that grace this earth.

  • Linda says:

    Laurie: Your article is beautiful. I hope it inspires many parents to follow your lead. It can be terrifying when your children exhibit their anger and frustrations, but your advice is what children need. The pulling away some parents do can only make a child believe that they are not important to their parents. God Bless.

  • [...] This post appeared as an article on The Attached Family, the online journal of Attachment Parenting … [...]

  • I am in full agreement that all children should be honored – throughout childhood: listened to, nurtured, respected.

    Where I disagree is where you say attachment parenting teens means…allowing them to unschool. Yes, teens – as all children – should be able to direct their own activities, to persue their passions; but this can also be done within a respectful school environment as well (like Montessori); parents and children should feel able to choose elements of life – like schooling – that fit within their lifestyle and childrens’ personalities, without feeling they need to adhere to specifics in order to be attached parents.

    Including unschooling as a “requirement” of attachment parenting teens is like including cloth diapering as a requirement of attachment parenting infants. They both may fall under natural parenting choices, but they aren’t requirements of parenting in an attached way.

    But otherwise, I really love your expression here, particularly this line: “it means guiding them in life and cultivating a loving, peaceful relationship…fly when they are ready”.

  • Shelly says:

    I have tears welled up in my eyes because THIS is what I believe is possible. Thank you fir writing what is in my heart and mind.

  • Leslie says:

    This is a beautiful! As a mom to four boys, I take this advice straight to heart.

  • crzzi says:

    As I read this I could feel the love! I am a mum with one child, my amazing son Leo. The most precious thing in my life. My greatest achievement. When I look at him and watch him grow and develop I could burst with pride at the person he is. LeO is 16 years old. He has just left school and will start college in September. My baby boy is now a young adult but the cuddles are still as prevelant as ever. Like the author my son is a young confident balanced pleasant and loving young man. He knows his own mind and is active and outgoing. My parenting technique has allowed him to grow and develop his own person with plenty of loving reassurance to help him along. Its the greatest gift. We are entering a new phase in our relationship now as he is transforming from a child to a man but the bond we have will never change. I love you leo. An excellent piece of writing it was nice to read!

  • Rita says:

    Thank you, I really enjoyed reading this. Sometimes I feel like the only attachment parenting mom to adolescents and teens; you reminded me I am not. Attachment parenting comes naturally to me, and I felt being AP while they were babies and toddlers was easy. It is still “natural” for me, but I am so much more careful balancing independence and realizing that AP is also independence. So much of parenting is instinct but it can often be hard to go with your instinct when there are so many outside forces pushing the other direction. Regardless, I thoroughly enjoyed this read :)

  • Meg says:

    YES YES YES! As an unschooling mama with a teenager, I am forever frustrated by the invisible line in the sand where somehow we stop connecting via attachment theory, and start forcing our children to become independent. It’s one thing to force a toddler to be independent early – a damaging thing – but it’s a whole other world when forcing independence involves pushing a child into a world that is unforgiving, hypersexualised, and full of cars and alcohol. Children, no matter their age, need their parents behind them.

    Thank you so much for writing this! I wish there were more resources about parenting a teen because sometimes I feel like I am out of my depth, like I am the only attachment parent of a teenager in the whole world.

  • Thank you everyone for all of these wonderful comments- I am so heart-warmed to hear your positive feedback and how the article reinforced your instincts.

    @Kelly, unschooling is the natural state of children’s learning and the way nature intended children to learn. Most other forms of education are cultural and often imposed upon children. School environments can disrupt secure parent-child attachment. My research has supported this view.

    @crzzi and @Rita, how heartwarming to hear from other Moms who cherish their teens and enjoy a deep connection with them!

    @Celeste, please be cautious around the “Love and Logic” series- They are not attachment parenting advocates and actually advocate for coercive, punitive tactics, including corporal punishment. I researched the series for my Master’s Thesis many years ago and had to go through some of it with a fine toothed comb. I do not recommend those books. Check out Jan Hunt, Pam Leo, Ashley Montagu, Jean Liedloff and my own book, Instead of Medicating and Punishing.

    Laurie

  • Lili says:

    Thank you for sharing your wisdom in such a clear way.

  • WIlma says:

    Thanks for such a wonderful article. I am mom to two toddlers, and they are far from their teens. BUT I really love being with them, cuddling! It is so precious, and I want it to last for as long as they let it! Wonderful!

  • [...] Attachment Parenting is a form of parenting where sling wearing / co sleeping is the norm and I love the closeness of this parenting idea. I do love to research this type of thing and find it fascinating. [...]

  • Julinda says:

    Enjoyed the article. My kids go to public school but I try to be watchful for its effects.

  • Eileen says:

    Loved the refreshing difference to reward/punishment. It makes the stress of parenting a teenager go away when mutual respect is the main goal, not “winning” arguments or controlling behaviors. I know that when my teen or I feel controlled or disrespected, it just doesn’t go anywhere and plan just doesn’t feel right!

  • Alan says:

    Stop referring to him as a “child” He’s seventeen, almost an adult by legal standards.

  • Julia says:

    Beautiful article! I just wanted to mention, as a homeschool parent and a former Montessori student, that both unschooling and Montessori share things in common during the teen years. Both are honoring and respectful of the individual, and child-led, where they’re allowed the freedom to explore their own interests.

  • Julia says:

    BTW- “almost” an adult is a “child” by legal standards.

  • Laurie says:

    I agree that parents need to be reminded that children are…children even when they have a two-digit age. So many parents say, “Well, they’re nine now and they’ll be teenagers soon…” For sure, they need that bonding and reassurance especially as they move through the uncertainty that adolescence brings. What I don’t understand is the judgment I hear for parents who don’t walk the exact same path you have chosen. There are portions of AP that some people do not embrace for one reason or the other and it certainly does not harm their children in most cases. My hope is that, people who choose to take AP to the max are doing so to contribute to a more peaceful world, not to feel superior to others.

  • Colleen says:

    This is all great, and I understand the reasoning and philosophy behind it, but how does one go from being disconnected from their teen to reconnecting, when the teen is so entrenched in “peer orientation”?
    This last year has been so hard on me and I really am trying my best, but nothing is working. I have obviously failed my daughter somewhere along the lines as she constantly points it out!

  • Colleen,

    We’d like to offer you some resources you may find helpful:
    1. Gordon Neufeld, PhD, writes and teaches extensively about peer orientation, http://www.neufeldinstitute.com.
    2. Heather Forbes, LCSW, writes and teaches about attachment difficulties, http://www.beyondconsequences.com.
    3. You may wish to post your question on the API Forum, where you will be connected to experienced API Leaders and other parents facing similar situations, http://www.attachmentparenting.org/forums/home. To post a question on the Forum, you will need a login and password, which you can sign up for in the top right corner of the Forum homepage.
    4. There are a number of additional articles about attachment parenting and teens available on TheAttachedFamily.com (enter “teens” in the search box).
    5. You may also wish to find a local API Support Group, http://www.attachmentparenting.org/groups/groups.php

    We hope you find this information helpful as you navigate this challenging period.

    -TheAttachedFamily

  • @Alan, Adolescence is a stage of childhood, therefore, adolescents are children. In fact, although the law states that a young person is an “adult” at age 18, nature and biology say something different. Although many youth are capable and mature by 18, it is important to be aware that the human brain does not fully mature until age 24 or 25. The body, also, especially in boys, does not fully develop and complete adolescence until 24 or 25, depending upon the individual. Attuned and intuitive parents just ‘know” these facts and don’t try to force their older children out of the nest or away from emotional dependency. It is always best to allow nature to work its magic with each unique individual and to allow each adolescent to develop at his or her own unique pace.

  • @Colleen, It is very possible to reconnect with your teen after a disconnected relationship! My book, Instead of Medicating and Punishing, is focused entirely on healing attachment disruption for children of all ages, including teens. Also, many families have found my Attachment Parenting coaching services helpful for specific 1:1 support.

  • Chelsea says:

    I loved the article. However, but I find your comment where you said people are children until their mid twenties odd. In the peaceful tribal societies I’ve read about, such as the !Kung San, young people, especially young women, become adult members of the group in their mid to late teens. That includes marriage and having their first child. Those mothers that believers in your style of parenting are following are teen moms.

    You mentioned Jean Liedloff’s The Continuum Concept. Jean actually praised a book claiming that adolescence is an artificial extension of childhood (based on history and anthropology) with negative effects on teens. It is by Robert Epstein. Here’s what Jean said about it(paraphrased, I don’t have it in front of me): “Although human evolution for hundreds of millennia to be fully competent adults and parents, our current society finds it convenient to view them as children. Robert Epstein makes a great case for correcting this costly error”.

  • Chelsea says:

    Oops… I meant to type millennia trusted teens to be…

  • Heather B says:

    Our ongoing relationship with our kids is so critical in setting them up to succeed. Even in middle school/preteen/tween years, despite typical notions that kids don’t want anything to do with their parents, we (and they) know that they really do still need and want our attention and relationship. As we approach these typically challenging years, we are equipping ourselves to succeed with our son.

  • Boobledy Goop says:

    I disagree with the assumption that our society is uncomfortable with the strong mother/son relationship. In fact, I believe it is quite the contrary. Most of my male peers as a teenager praised and reveled in the fact that they shared an unbeatable and unbreakable bond with their mothers. I also believe that our current culture, the one that places a large amount of responsibility on the woman to promote, encourage, and maintain all emotional aspects of relationships in lieu of dividing up the responsibility equally between man and woman, not only acknowledges the bond between mother and son, but it creates an adversarial atmosphere between the spouse of a man and his mother in regards to affection and fostering it. Not to sound dense, but I partially believe that our culture’s acceptance and even promotion of an emotionally invasive relationship between mother and son, while under the guise of a healthy relationship, interferes directly with a man’s expectations and unrealistic desires of a woman. Marrying a woman who takes a larger portion of responsibility than the man in every aspect is becoming more and more common. Partnerships are rare anymore.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.