The 4 Parenting Styles: What Works and What Doesn’t

By Dr. Maryann Rosenthal, co-author of Be A Parent, Not A Pushover, reprinted with permission from

Parenting stylesI believe it’s that overall style or pattern of action — rather than a specific decision — that will most affect a child’s behavior. Generally, psychologists have found that there are two main components of parenting styles.

One is responsiveness, or how much independence you’re willing to grant. The other, for lack of a better word, is demandingness — how much strict obedience you require. How much obedience parents demand, how much freedom they grant, and how these two behaviors mesh go a long way toward defining the parents’ style.

These parenting styles fall into a generally accepted four broad categories. Though different researchers give different names to them, the styles usually are said to be: Authoritarian, Authoritative, Permissive, and Uninvolved.


Authoritarian parents are very strict and controlling. They have a strong sense of justice and of the need for obedience. They’re big believers in clearly stated rules. If their kids don’t “see the light” (behave as ordered), then those teens will “feel the heat” (be punished). Such parents take a dim view of being challenged. Give-and-take with their children is discouraged.

Thus, these parents are highly demanding but not very responsive. Researchers believe children of authoritarian parents tend to be timid, have lower self-esteem, lack spontaneity, and rely to an unusual degree on the voice of authority.


While retaining authority and control, these parents are warmer and more communicative than Authoritarian parents. Authoritative parents seek a balance between the teens’ desire for independence and the parents’ desire to be listened to. These parents are demanding and responsive. They’re assertive but not intrusive or restrictive. They want their children to be assertive as well as socially responsible and self-regulated as well as cooperative.

The best-adjusted children, researchers have found, often have parents with an Authoritative style. Both the Authoritarian and the Authoritative parents have high expectations for their children, but the Authoritative parent encourages more freedom of expression. So the child more likely develops a sense of independence. Such kids tend to develop into more competent adults than children brought up in the other styles.


Permissive parents, while often warm and accepting, make few demands on their children. They’re lenient, avoid confrontation, and allow considerable self-regulation. They may worry about thwarting the child’s creativity and sense of self. They’re much more responsive than they are demanding.

Sometimes the Permissive style is based on confusion. The parents are so out of touch with the pre-adolescent and adolescent world that the best they can do is to try to be a pal to their child. So they tend to give their kids what they ask for and hope that they are loved for their accommodating style.

Other Permissive parents want to compensate for what they themselves lacked as children. Perhaps they grew up in poverty and/or had parents who were overly strict. So as a result, seeing themselves as an ally to their child, these parents bend over backwards to give the child both the freedom and the material goods they lacked. Yet other Permissive parents act conditionally. They view the maturing child as a mini-adult and give him or her what he or she wants, provided the child satisfies certain parental demands. Making good grades, for example, may be linked to freedom and material benefits.

Or, at its most lax extreme, permissiveness may take the form of indifference. The parents are just too busy, poor, troubled, or self-involved to exert much control. They may give material goods and freedom in return for the child’s implicit promise not to demand much from the parent.


The uninvolved parent demands almost nothing and gives almost nothing in return, except near-absolute freedom. This style is low in both demandingness and responsiveness. At its worst, it can verge into neglect.

How would these parenting styles work in practice? For example, a teen wants to go with a bunch of friends on a weekend outing to Mexico where, the parent suspects, wild partying is on the agenda because of younger drinking-age requirements there:

  • An Authoritarian parent might say: “No way! And if I ever catch you going down there without my OK, you’ll be in big trouble.”
  • An Authoritative parent may respond: “No, I don’t want you to go down there right now with your friends. But let’s you and I go down soon, though, and check it out. If it looks OK, maybe you can go later with your buddies.”
  • A Permissive parent would say: “Sure, go and have fun, but be careful.”
  • An Uninvolved parent may reply: “Whatever.”

Parenting style has been found to predict child well-being in a number of areas, including social skills, academic performance, and the degree of problem behavior. The Authoritarian, Permissive, and Uninvolved styles can carry a high cost:

  • Children of Authoritarian parents, for example, may do well in school and not engage in problem behavior, but they tend to have poorer social skills, lower self-esteem, and higher levels of depression. They may grow up to be highly anxious people who don’t realize their full potential because, figuratively speaking, they’re always looking over their shoulder for that overly-demanding parent.
  • The children of Permissive parents may come to feel entitled to privileges and material goods. If the parents try to regain control, the older child probably will perceive that effort to be a power struggle. He or she may fight back in dangerous ways, including sexual rebellion, unsavory associates, or substance abuse. Thus, they’re more likely to be involved in problem behavior and perform less well in school, though they have higher self-esteem, better social skills, and lower levels of depression than Authoritarian children.
  • And Uninvolved parents, of course, can sow a lifetime of havoc by their indifference or inability to deal with their children.

Authoritative parenting, which balances clear, high parental demands with emotional responsiveness and recognition of the child’s need for autonomy, is one of the most consistent predictors of social competence. Thus, the child of Authoritative parents typically does well in school, develops good social skills, and avoids problem behaviors.

Studies show that the benefits of Authoritative parenting and the disadvantages of Uninvolved parenting are evident as early as the preschool years and continue throughout adolescence and into early adulthood. A recent study of 1,000 teens, for instance, by the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse evaluated a “hands-on” (roughly equivalent to the Authoritarian or Authoritative styles) approach versus a “hands-off ” (akin to the Permissive or Uninvolved styles) approach to parenting and found that teens living with “hands-on” parents are at only 25% of the risk for drug abuse than those living in “hands-off ” households. Similarly, 47% of teens in “hands-on” households reported having an excellent relationship with their fathers and 57% an excellent relationship with their mothers. By contrast, 13% of teens with “hands-off” parents reported an excellent relationship with their fathers and 24% with their mothers.

“Moms and dads should be parents to their children, not pals,” said Joseph Califano Jr., former Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, in summing up the study. “Mothers and fathers who are parents rather than pals can greatly reduce the risk of children smoking, drinking, and using drugs.”

Editor’s Note: Attachment Parenting International advocates a certain approach to parenting in order to develop close, healthy emotional bonds between the parent and child, and this looks different in different families, but it is ideal for attached families to strive toward the science-backed Authoritative parenting style.

20 thoughts on “The 4 Parenting Styles: What Works and What Doesn’t”

  1. Thank you for posting this article. It was a great reminder and I loved re-reading the types of parenting styles out there. I definitely grew up in an authoritarian family and I strive though to be an authoritative parent myself. Sometimes it’s not easy but the end result is something that keeps me going. 🙂

  2. In Alfie Kohn’s Unconditional Parenting, he addresses this very aspect of different parenting styles. In the chapter, “What Holds Us Back,” he writes: “In fact, the “reasonable middle ground” option may not be all that reasonable when evaluated on its merits. One example in the discipline field is Diana Baumrind’s schema, which has been adopted by lots of researchers as well as practitioners. She describes parenting as being “authoritarian” on one side, “permissive” on the other, or “authoritative” in the middle. In reality, her favored approach, supposedly a blend of firmness and caring, is actually quite traditional and control-oriented – even if less so than option 1. In fact, a close reading of Baurind’s research raises questions about the recommendations she offers, particularly her endorsement of “firm control.”

    The larger point is that we may be tempted to accept a certain approach just because of how discussion about parenting has been framed, and specifically because we believe that rejecting one or two other approaches requires us to embrace a given alternative. To recognize that there are many possible ways of raising children, and to question the validity of various other ideologies, is to free us to explore new directions that may end up making a lot more sense than conventional wisdom.”

    All the best,


  3. Thank you MJ. I could not agree with you more. The article was interesting but raises a lot of questions. The only study sited here focuses on extremes of parenting and how that relates to drug abuse (the study only had 1K participants as well). I am off to find out what other studies Rosenthal uses to back her opinions.

  4. The obedience to be demanded and freedom to grant your kids is the most hard decision in my life yet a fulfilling part of a parent.

  5. Thanks Dr. Rosenthal. This is a great article mentioning different styles for parents. What I often wonder is, how we can customize the styles for siblings. We have seen kids behaving in different ways or growing into adults with different behaviors though the parents used the same style for each of the siblings. Any thoughts?

  6. I have been looking…and have not found…a good article about the devastating affect of different parenting styles on Grandparents.

    This is a HUGE issue.

    Oh sure, some people think authoritarian and permissive parents deserve what they get when their children choose to parent the grandchildren with the authoritative style. These parents and grandparents need tools for conversation about the decision to “do it differently.”

    PLEASE HELP the authoritative grandparent, whose child chooses to be a permissive—seemingly lazy—parent. Part of the choice to be permissive seems to be for the purpose of punishing the grandparent OR distancing the grandparent.

    My DIL punishes her parents who were authoritarian, by insisting on permissive style while having recruited her parents to provide most hands on care. It is very difficult for them to deal with the extreme and the “brats” that have been tacitly taught disrespect.

    My DIL punishes me for being authoritative, by mocking my desire to discuss behavior with my grandchildren. She wants me out of the picture entirely and uses my authoritative nature against me by ridiculing me to my son and encouraging the grandchildren to ignore me and worse– to outright rebel against any boundaries even at my own home. Of course this behavior is at it’s worst in the presence of parents. Part of my problem is I am not allowed to have time alone. The authoritative grandparent with positive parenting skills is shut out.

    It is as though this is her way of shutting out the mother-in-law so she can keep husband and children to herself and her family.

    Her father and brother teach the children all sorts of wild behavior that is not acceptable in a classroom, playground, restaurant or other “civilized” place. Thus, she reinforces her desire to keep everyone at her home. Her way or the highway – and I simply can’t cope with the screaming, chaos, and disrespect!

    EGAD! Please help. Do you have a good article on this? If not, would you publish one or perhaps a series????

  7. Question: How do you tell whether you’re really being “authoritative” or just applying that label to whatever you’re doing anyway? It seems like once you know that’s the “right” way to be, you can just convince yourself that that’s exactly how you are even if it’s not true. Is there a way to measure this besides fallible self-observation, or do we just wait for the kids to grow up and see “how we did?” (The latter would be unreliable anyway given that some kids are resilient enough to overcome bad parenting, and besides you can never tell what they’d have been like–better or worse–if they’d been parented differently.)

  8. Reminded me of a comment from our online parenting group. It’s so much easier to be a “brick wall” parent vs. a parent with a “backbone” meaning giving choices and taking time to talk through situations. Evaluation, choices…builds assertive behaviors with self-esteem in check making for positive adult relationships.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *